Only 7% of You Have Really Gotten Outsourced SDRs to Work
And How Snowflake Manages 100+ SDRs Across 4 Continents
So a recent SaaS survey confirmed what Iāve experienced over the year:Ā outsourced SDRs are tough to make work.
It would be so great if we could all outsource sales, sales development, sales operations, and more.Ā It really would be great.Ā Itās just hard in practice to outsource something you donāt already know well yourself.
Personally, Iāve seen it sort of work a few times ā and thatās why I added āsortā as an option, and 26% of you also said it had sort of worked:
We used an experienced outsourced team at SaaS itself to bring in new sponsors, and they added about 8% of new revenue.Ā Worth it, but the margins were lower than core customers, and it took up a lot of bandwidth.
Iāve invested in 2 startups that micromanaged outsourced SDR teams to some success.Ā They managed the resources, wrote the scripts, reviewed the lists, etc. Still, neither stuck with those agencies after 4-6 months.
But what I personally havenāt seen is an outsourced SDR team replace an in-house one.Ā It would be great if it could, especially given the high turnover rate in SDRs.Ā I just havenāt yet seen it work.
Itās hard to outsource your core, especially when there are so, so many competitors on the market.
And a few great insights from others in the comments:
āIMO, if youāre going to hire and outsourced BDR team, they either need to 1. Specialize within your market Or 2. Use them exclusively for inbound qualificationā
ā Kevin Kost, Director CS, GrammaTech
āYes and noā¦.very dependent on product complexity and buying cycleā¦.would argue as a quick fix / extra focus on opening up a new region / segment, itās viable (and has been) provided sufficient enablement tools are in place (to allow for clear targeting / messaging) with regular oversight / value prop re-calibration. Negative ā in case of seasonal cycles or very sudden changes to market condiitions, itās harder to quickly pivot external resources. Long term, thereās no substitute to internalā¦who are part of your culture, have real-time access to cross functional information etc.ā
ā Marcus Kingsley, VPS, SchoolStatus
āHasnāt worked for us, and weāve trialed a number of well-managed, diligent organisations. For a high AOV and a complex product, there is no substitute for having your own team and investing in their expertise in the product and ICP over time.ā
ā James Rehm COO, Skuuudle
āPre-pattern is brutally hard as it requires so much iteration/lock picking. even then. stage/vertical/solution dependent etcā
ā Ben Virdee-Chapman, VPM, Gig Wage
āHard for B2B saas, where the solution is geared towards solving sophisticated customer workflows. Customers expect more product knowledge, even at the appointment setting engagement.ā
ā Eric Harrington, Co-Founder, TeamSupport.com
āThe interesting thing about this question is most of the people who pay to outsource SDRs are usually the same people who have not figured out how to make the SDR model work for them internally. Iāve actually never seen a company thatās cracked the outbound model then switch to outsourcing itā¦ because why would they?
So really the question is; have SDRs worked for you? If yes, have outsourced SDRs worked for you? Itās like trying to hire a sales team before the CEO proves the sales model themselves. Rarely works ā
ā Colin Cadmus, ex-VPS, Aircall
āā-
OK i know a lot of folks will disagree here, like they do on Fractional CROs and CMOs and similar targets.Ā Especially folks that provide these services.Ā Iām just sharing my learnings.Ā And those of the 1,200+ from the survey above.
I have had some success myself in general outsourcing core functions ā but only when Iād already done them well myself, and only when I treated the outsourced resources as part of the core team.Ā Including coming to team meetings, a long-term commit, etc.
And a really great session with Snowflakeās VP of Global Sales on how they manage 100+ SDRs across the world here: